Thursday, October 27, 2016

Comprehensive Website by Gandhian Institutions - Bombay Sarvodaya Mandal & Gandhi Research Foundation
buy-books-online
HomeAbout UsContact UsSitemapGlossary/SourcesSearchJoin us on: Blogger   & Follow us on: Twitter.com

SEVEN DEADLY SINS
As per Mahatma Gandhi

MBA Projects for effective management on Gandhi's principles


GANDHI - An effective leader and manager (Power point presentation)


Book Name
Principle Centered Leadership
Author
Stephen R. Covey
Publisher
Simon & Schuster Ltd., West Garden Place,

Kendal Street, London W2 2AQ

"Dr. Stephen R. Covey - one of the world's leading management consultants and author of the best selling book The Seven Habits Of Highly Effective People - is co-chairman of Franklin Covey located in Salt Lake City, Utah in the U.S.A. Franklin Covey provides consultancy services to Fortune 500 companies as well as thousand of small and mid-size companies, educational institutions, government and other organisations world-wide. Their work in Principle Centered Leadership is considered to be an instrumental foundation to the effectiveness of quality, leadership, service, team building, organisational alignment and other strategic corporate initiatives.
Excerpts from Chapter 7 - SevenDeadly Sins - Page 87 to 93
Mahatma Gandhi said that seven things will destroy us. Notice that all of them have to do with social and political conditions. Note also that the antidote of each of these "deadly sins" is an explicit external standard or something that is based on natural principles and laws, not on social values.

Wealth Without Work
Pleasure Without Conscience
Knowledge Without Character
Commerce (Business) Without Morality (Ethics)
Science Without Humanity
Religion Without Sacrifice
Politics Without Principle
© 1990 Stephen R. Covey. All rights reserved. Reprinted with permission.
The Seven Habits and Principle-Centered Leadership are registered trademarks of Franklin Covey and are used with permission. To learn more about Franklin Covey, visit their web-site at www.franklincovey.com
This refers to the practice of getting something for nothing - manipulating markets and assets so you don't have to work or produce added value, just manipulate people and things. Today there are professions built around making wealth without working, making much money without paying taxes, benefiting from free government programs without carrying a fair share of the financial burdens, and enjoying all the perks of citizenship of country and membership of corporation without assuming any of the risk or responsibility.
How many of the fraudulent schemes that went on in the 1980s, often called the decade of greed, were basically get-rich-quick schemes or speculations promising practitioners, "You don't even have to work for it"? That is why I would be very concerned if one of my children went into speculative enterprises or if they learned how to make a lot of money fast without having to pay the price by adding value on a day-to-day basis.
Some network marketing and pyramidal organizations worry me because many people get rich quick by building a structure under them that feeds them without work. They are rationalized to the hilt; nevertheless the overwhelming emotional motive is often greed: "You can get rich without much work. You may have to work initially, but soon you can have wealth without work." New social mores and norms are cultivated that cause distortions in their judgement.
Justice and judgement are inevitably inseparable, suggesting that to the degree you move away from the laws of nature, your judgement will be adversely affected. You get distorted notions. You start telling rational lies to explain why things work or why they don't. You move away from the law of "the farm" into social / political environments.
When we read of organisations in trouble, we often hear the sad confessions of executives who tell of moving away from natural laws and principles for a period of time and begin overbuilding, over borrowing, and over speculating, not really reading the stream or getting objective feedback, just hearing a lot of self-talk internally. Now they have a high debt to pay. They may have to work hard just to survive - without hope of being healthy for five years or more. It's back to the basics, hand to the plow. And many of these executives, in earlier days, were critical of the conservative founders of the corporations who stayed close to the fundamentals and preferred to stay small and free of debt.

The chief query of the immature, greedy, selfish, and sensuous has always been, "What's in it for me? Will this please me? Will it ease me?" Lately many people seem to want these pleasures without conscience or sense of responsibility, even abandoning or utterly neglecting spouses and children in the name of doing their thing. But independence is not the most mature state of being - it's only a middle position on the way to interdependence, the most advanced and mature state. To learn to give and take, to live selflessly, to be sensitive, to be considerate, is our challenge. Otherwise there is no sense of social responsibility or accountability in our pleasurable activities.
The ultimate costs of pleasures without conscience are high as measured in terms of time and money, in terms of reputation and in terms of wounding the hearts and minds of other people who are adversely affected by those who just want to indulge and gratify themselves in the short term. It's dangerous to be pulled or lulled away from natural law without conscience. Conscience is essentially the repository of timeless truths and principles - the internal monitor of natural law.
A prominent, widely published psychologist worked to align people with their moral conscience in what was called "integrity therapy." He once told me that he was a manic-depressive. "I knew I was getting suicidal," he said. "Therefore, I committed myself to a mental institution. I tried to work out of it, neutralize it, until I reached the point where I could leave the hospital. I don't do clinical work now because it is too stressful. I mostly do research. And through my own struggle, I discovered that integrity therapy was the only way to go. I gave up my mistress, confessed to my wife, and had peace for the first time in my life. ""
Pleasure without conscience is one of the key temptations for today's executives. Sometimes on airplanes I'll scan the magazines directed at executives, noting the advertisements. Many of these ads, perhaps two-thirds of them, invite executives to indulge themselves without conscience because they "deserve it" or have "earned it" or "want it," and why not "give in" and "let it all hang out"? The seductive message is, "You've arrived. You are now a law unto yourself. You don't need a conscience to govern you anymore." And in some ads you see sixty-year-old men with attractive thirty-year old women, the "significant others" who accompany some executives to conventions. Whatever happened to spouses? What happened to the social mores that make cheating on spouses illegitimate behaviour?
As dangerous as a little knowledge is, even more dangerous is much knowledge without a strong, principled character. Purely intellectual development without commensurate internal character development makes as much sense as putting a high-powered sports car in the hands of a teenager who is high on drugs. Yet all too often in the academic world, that's exactly what we do by not focusing on the character development of young people.
One of the reasons I'm excited about taking the Seven Habits into the schools is that it is character education. Some people don't like character education because, they say, "that's your value system." But you can get a common set of values that everyone agrees on. It is not that difficult to decide, for example, that kindness, fairness, dignity, contribution, and integrity are worth keeping. No one will fight you on those. So let's start with values that are unarguable and infuse them in our education system and in our corporate training and development programs. Let's achieve a better balance between the development of character and intellect.
The people who are transforming education today are doing it by building consensus around a common set of principles, values, and priorities and debunking the high degree of specialization, departmentalization, and partisan politics.

In his book Moral Sentiment, which preceded Wealth of Nations, Adam Smith explained how foundational to the success of our systems is the moral foundation : how we treat each other, the spirit of benevolence, of service, of contribution. If we ignore the moral foundation and allow economic systems to operate without moral foundation and without continued education, we will soon create an amoral, if not immoral, society and business. Economic and political systems are ultimately based on a moral foundation.
To Adam Smith, every business transaction is a moral challenge to see that both parties come out fairly. Fairness and benevolence in business are the underpinnings of the free enterprise system called capitalism. Our economic system comes out of a constitutional democracy where minority rights are to be attended to as well. The spirit of the Golden Rule or of win-win is a spirit of morality, of mutual benefit, of fairness for all concerned. Paraphrasing one of the mottos of the Rotary Club, "Is it fair and does it serve the interests of all the stakeholders?" That's just a moral sense of stewardship toward all of the stakeholders.
I like that Smith says every economic transaction. People get in trouble when they say that most of their economic transactions are moral. That means there is something going on that is covert, hidden, secret. People keep a hidden agenda, a secret life, and they justify and rationalize their activities. They tell themselves rational lies so they don't have to adhere to natural laws. If you can get enough rationalization in a society, you can have social mores or political wills that are totally divorced from natural laws and principles.
I once met a man who for five years served as the "ethics director" for a major aerospace company. He finally resigned the post in protest and considered leaving the company, even though he would lose a big salary and benefit package. He said that the executive team had their own separate set of business ethics and that they were deep into rationalization and justification. Wealth and power were big on their agendas, and they made no excuse for it anymore. They were divorced from reality even inside their own organization. They talked about serving the customer while absolutely mugging their own employees.
If science becomes all technique and technology, it quickly degenerates into man against humanity. Technologies come from the paradigms of science. And if there's very little understanding of the higher human purposes that the technology is striving to serve, we becomes victims of our own technocracy. We see otherwise highly educated people climbing the scientific ladder of success, even though it's often missing the rung called humanity and leaning against the wrong wall.
The majority of the scientists who ever lived or living today, and they have brought about a scientific and technological explosion in the world. But if all they do is superimpose technology on the same old problems, nothing basic changes. We may see an evolution, an occasional "revolution" in science, but without humanity we see precious little real human advancement. All the old inequities and injustices are still with us.
About the only thing that hasn't evolved are these natural laws and principles - the true north on the compass. Science and technology have changed the face of most everything else. But the fundamental things still apply, as time goes by.

Without sacrifice we may become active in a church but remain inactive in its gospel. In other words, we go for the social facade of religion and the piety of religious practices. There is no real walking with people or going the second mile or trying to deal with our social problems that may eventually undo our economic system. It takes sacrifice to serve the needs of other people - the sacrifice of our own pride and prejudice, among other things.
If a church or religion is seen as just another hierarchical system, its members won't have a sense of service or inner workship. Instead they will be into outward observances and all the visible accoutrements of religion. But they are neither God-centered nor principle-centered.
The principles of three of the Seven Habits pertain to how we deal with other people, how we serve them, how we sacrifice for them, how we contribute. Habits 4, 5 and 6 - win-win interdependency, empathy, and synergy - require tremendous sacrifice. I've come to believe that they require a broken heart and a contrite spirit - and that, for some, is the ultimate sacrifice. For example, I once observed a marriage where there were frequent arguments. One thought came to me : "These two people must have a broken heart and a contrite spirit toward each other or this union will never last." You can't have a oneness, a unity, without humility. Pride and selfishness will destroy the union between man and god, between man and woman, between man and man, between self and self.
The great servant leaders have that humility, the hallmark of inner religion. I know a few CEOs who are humble servant leaders - who sacrifice their pride and share their power - and I can say that their influence both inside and outside their companies is multiplied because of it. Sadly, many people want "religion," or at least the appearance of it, without any sacrifice. They want more spirituality but would never miss a meal in meaningful fasting or do one act of anonymous service to achieve it.
If there is no principle, there is no true north, nothing you can depend upon. The focus on the personality ethic is the instant creation of an image that sells well in the social and economic marketplace.
You see politicians spending millions of dollars to create an image, even though it's superficial, lacking substance, in order to get votes and gain office. And when it works, it leads to a political system operating independently of the natural laws that should govern - - that are built into the Declaration of Independence : "We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness . . . . "
In other words, they are describing self-evident, external, observable, natural, unarguable, self-evident laws: "We hold these Truths to be self-evident." The key to a healthy society is to get the social will, the value system, aligned with correct principles. You then have the compass needle pointing to true north - true north representing the external or the natural law - and the indicator says that is what we are building our value system on : they are aligned.
But if you get a sick social will behind the political will that is independent of principle, you could have a very sick organization or society with distorted values. For instance, the professed mission and shared values of criminals who rape, rob and plunder might sound very much like many corporate mission statements, using such words as "teamwork," "cooperation," "loyalty," "profitability," "innovation," and "creativity." The problem is that their value system is not based on a natural law.
Figuratively, inside many corporations with lofty mission statements, many people are being mugged in broad daylight in front of witnesses. Or they are being robbed of self-esteem, money, or position without due process. And if there is no social will behind the principles of due process, and if you can't get due process, you have to go to the jury of your peers and engage in counterculture sabotage.
In the movie The Ten Commandments, Moses says to the pharaoh, "We are to be governed by God's law, not by you." In effect he's saying, "We will not be governed by a person unless that person embodies the law." In the best societies and organizations, natural laws and principles govern - that's the Constitution - and even the top people must bow to the principle. No one is above it.

The Seven Habits will help you avoid these Seven Deadly Sins.
And if you don't buy into the Seven Habits, try the Ten Commandments.

Chapter 9 - Principle-Centered Power - Page 108
To some, these principles and the ideals they represent are readily attributable to notable leaders of distinction such as Mahatma Gandhi, but they are harder to find in the much more common experiences of everyday living. In response to this concern, Gandhi replied, "I claim to be no more than an average man with less than average ability. I am not a visionary. I claim to be a practical idealist. Nor can I claim any special merit for what I have been able to achieve with laborious research. I have not the shadow of a doubt that any man or woman can achieve what I have, if he or she would make the same effort and cultivate the same hope and faith.

A Personal Note - Page 323
Gandhi emphasized : "A person cannot do right in one department whilst attempting to do wrong in another department. Life is one indivisible whole. "


You are visitor no. counter to our website.
Keep on visiting regularly updated comprehensive site Developed by Bombay Sarvodaya Mandal and Gandhi Research Foundation, Jalgaon
Site design by: JainArt, Best viewed in: Firefox & IE with resolution 1024 x 768

Friday, May 20, 2016

Which is the oldest language in the World?

Which is the oldest language in the World? (Experiences with Maha Periyava:Tiruvannamalai Gowrishankar). When I went to the Kanchi Mutt to have the darshan of Sri Maha Periyava, there were four foreigners there, an Israeli, an Italian, a German and a British. They had come to do their PhD in Philology on the topic of 'the most ancient languages in the Occidental and the Oriental world'. They were studying Latin, Hebrew and Greek languages in the Occidental part and Sanskrit and Tamil in the Oriental part. Maha Periyava was in his private quarters, performing His Nithya Karma Anushtanas and elaborate poojas; they had waited and desired to take a photo of Him but His kaingaryams refused permission. They were heartbroken that they could not take a picture. All the four of them were standing near a tree since morning waiting for Periyava to finish his poojas and give darshan. They asked His sevakas when He would be done with the poojas but got an unconvincing reply. I told the foreigners that we Indians are used to the way of life at the Mutt, but how had they all been standing for the past 6 hours? One of them looked at his watch and exclaimed, “Oh my God, has it been 6 hours? He is a Man of Certainty and is Beyond Time!” Maha Periyava came in after 10 minutes and we all went and prostrated before Him. Looking at the man (who had the camera hanging around his neck) who had wanted to take the photos, He gestured with His hands that he could take the pictures now. He posed for three photos and stopped him before taking the fourth. ''Why have you all come here and what is the purpose of your visit? ", asked Periyava. ''We have visited many places regarding our research on the most ancient language''. Periyava asked, "So, did you arrive at a conclusion as to which is the most ancient language?" The Israeli replied, "Hebrew is the most ancient in the Occident; but in the Oriental, people say that both Sanskrit and Tamil are the oldest, but we are confused and that is why we are here for Your opinion". Periyava said, "There is another language which is more ancient than all these, it is the Vedic Language. It is the source of even Sanskrit and Hebrew." "There is a verse about rebirth in Hebrew, can you recite it completely?" asked Periyava to the Israeli by giving the man the first two words. The Israeli recited it for 3 to 4 minutes. Periyava looked around and asked some boys, “You have all learnt Rig Veda, can you recite this particular verse? He suggested some mantras to the boys." Those boys recited the Veda Mantras for 5 minutes. Periyava then addressed the Israeli ''Did you understand what these boys recited now?" The four men remained quiet. Maha Periyava smiled and turned to the boys and said "You all will definitely not understand what this man had recited in Hebrew!" He then turned to the Israeli and said, "What you have chanted before is the same as what these boys have chanted!" The 4 foreigners were stunned and did not know how to respond. Maha Periyava told them that he could prove it and asked for a paper and a pen. "In Vedas it is mentioned that the world has been classified into 32 portions/regions. And in each of the 32 geographic regions, Vedas say how the Veda Aksharas have changed/got pronounced in those places!" He asked each of them which region they came from and then explained to them how a particular Veda Aksharam got changed in their individual places! He asked the boys to recite a verse from Rig Veda again and told the men how each Aksharam in Rig Veda in that verse would sound in their Regions! The Sarveshwaran then said, "I will now recite this verse with some difficulty as it has been a long time since I had Abhyasam and the Mahan started to chant the mantra slowly, slightly differing from the basic shloka aksharam so that it matched how it would sound in Hebrew. After he recited the aksharams he asked the Israeli if he understood the recital of the mantra and aksharam and observed any familiarity. To the boys who recited the Vedas, He said, "I will now recite it in a slightly different form based on how each Aksharam will sound in Hebrew. Please do not think it is wrong; there is this injunction in the Vedas that it can be recited this way also." To everybody's astonishment and surprise, the Israeli started to recite in Hebrew what Maha Periyava exactly chanted- the aksharas in a modified form, as it resembled the Hebrew language. The Israeli therefore chanted it together with Him!!! We were all stunned!!! After this demonstration Maha Periyava addressed everyone assembled there, "I told you earlier, the same verse in Rig Veda is present ditto in Hebrew, but the Aksharas have changed slightly. (As we say Yamuna but in the North it is Jamuna, Va in the south is Ba in West Bengal, Paa in Tamil is Haa in Kannada etc). Therefore, the most ancient language in the world is the Vedic language!" Maha Periyava then asked for paper and pen to be supplied to the four men in order to prepare a table and fill it with how the Rig Veda Aksharams sounded in their language. This was completed in 15 minutes. The Israeli was shocked and exclaimed, "This is something unimaginable!" Periyava asked him, "What do you think now, do you now agree that everything has sprung from Vedas?" The look on the Israeli’s face was not convincing. Periyava quipped, "What, Are you thinking why could Vedas not have originated from Hebrew?" The man said, "Yes, it could have been the reverse also, the Vedas could have come from Hebrew". Periyava replied smilingly, "You only have the lock, whereas we have both the key and the lock! It is even mentioned in the Vedas as to which Maharishi from here in India went to your region and spread/taught Vedas in Israel!" The man was fully convinced in the end that the Vedic language is indeed the oldest and the most time honoured. (Translated from Thiruvannamalai Shri Gowrishankar's Tamil video interview)

Thursday, March 3, 2016






friends,

 you are one wave bubbling , on the ocean of bliss ,
 i am another wave , connected to same ocean ,
 all of me is inside you and all of you is inside me ,,, 

sometimes the ocean uses my body-mind to express OUR mutual sadness , sometimes the ocean uses your body-mind to express  OUR mutual energy

 . Sir sir .. at our age and life stage 
we deeply realize that some far more powerful force like that of an ocean is driving me and you .. 

to think that i can control myself or my life is questionable ..
the ocean power is driving us ..

 the more i accept this
 the easier it becomes to become a willing piece of water 
and to let the ocean to shape me as IT wishes !!

Sunday, January 31, 2016


emotionally intelligent

NowMeditate . nowmeditate@gmail.com

10/24/15
to VikrumSamirRahulManuk
http://www.sott.net/article/301437-Traits-of-emotionally-intelligent-people-and-the-things-they-dont-do



10/24/2015 Traits of emotionally intelligent people and the things they don't do ­­ Science of the Spirit ­­ Sott.net
http://www.sott.net/article/301437­Traits­of­emotionally­intelligent­people­and­the­things­they­dont­do 1/3
Brianna Wiest
Huffington Post
Thu, 10 Sep 20112:34 UTC
Emotional intelligence is probably the most powerful yet
undervalued trait in our society.
We believe in rooting our everyday functions in logic and
reason, yet we come to the same conclusions after long
periods of contemplation as we do in the blink of an eye.
Our leaders sorely overlook the human element of our
socio­political issues and I need not cite the divorce rate
for you to believe that we're not choosing the right
partners (nor do we have the capacity to sustain intimate
relationships for long periods of time).
It seems people believe the most intelligent thing to do is not have emotions at all. To be
effective is to be a machine, a product of the age. A well­oiled, consumerist­serving, digitally
attuned, highly unaware but overtly operational robot. And so we suffer.
Here are the habits of the people who have the capacity to be aware of what they feel. Who know how to express, process, dismantle and adjust their experience as they are
their own loci of control. They are the true leaders, they are living the most whole and
genuine lives, and it is from them we should be taking a cue. These are the things that
emotionally intelligent people do not do.
1. They don't assume that the way they think and feel about a situation is the way it is in
reality, nor how it will turn out in the end.
They recognize their emotions as responses, not accurate gauges, of what's going on. They
accept that those responses may have to do with their own issues, rather than the objective
situation at hand.
2. Their emotional base points are not external.
Their emotions aren't "somebody else's doing," and therefore "somebody else's
problem to resolve." Understanding that they are the ultimate cause of what they experience
keeps them out of falling into the trap of indignant passivity: Where one believes that as the
universe has done wrong, the universe will ultimately have to correct it.
3. They don't assume to know what it is that will make them truly happy.
Being that our only frame of reference at any given time is what's happened in the past, we
actually have no means to determine what would make us truly happy, as opposed to just
feeling "saved" from whatever we disliked about our past experiences. In understanding this,
they open themselves up to any experience that their life evolves toward, knowing there are
Traits of emotionally intelligent people and the things
they don't do
© Inconnu
10/24/2015 Traits of emotionally intelligent people and the things they don't do ­­ Science of the Spirit ­­ Sott.net
http://www.sott.net/article/301437­Traits­of­emotionally­intelligent­people­and­the­things­they­dont­do 2/3
equal parts good and bad in anything.
4. They don't think that being fearful is a sign they are on the wrong path.
The presence of indifference is a sign you're on the wrong path. Fear means you're trying to
move toward something you love, but your old beliefs, or unhealed experiences, are getting in
the way. (Or, rather, are being called up to be healed.)
5. They know that happiness is a choice, but they don't feel the need to make it all the
time.
They are not stuck in the illusion that "happiness" is a sustained state of joy. They allow
themselves time to process everything they are experiencing. They allow themselves to exist in
their natural state. In that non­resistance, they find contentment.
6. They don't allow their thoughts to be chosen for them.
They recognize that through social conditioning and the eternal human monkey­mind,
they can often be swayed by thoughts, beliefs and mindsets that were never theirs in
the first place. To combat this, they take inventory of their beliefs, reflect on their origins, and
decide whether or not that frame of reference truly serves them.
7. They recognize that infallible composure is not emotional intelligence.
They don't withhold their feelings, or try to temper them so much as to render them
almost gone. They do, however, have the capacity to withhold their emotional response until
they are in an environment wherein it would be appropriate to express how they are feeling.
They don't suppress it, they manage it effectively.
8. They know that a feeling will not kill them.
They've developed enough stamina and awareness to know that all things, even the worst, are
transitory.
9. They don't just become close friends with anyone.
They recognize true trust and intimacy as something you build, and something you want
to be discerning with whom you share. But they're not guarded or closed as they are simply
mindful and aware of who they allow into their lives and hearts. They are kind to all, but truly
open to few.
10. They don't confuse a bad feeling for a bad life.
They are aware of, and avoid, extrapolation, which is essentially projecting the present moment
into the foreseeable future ­­ believing that the moment at hand constitutes what your entire life
amounted to, rather than just being another passing, transitory experience in the whole.
Emotionally intelligent people allow themselves their "bad" days. They let themselves
be fully human. It's in this non­resistance that they find the most peace of all.